|
Issue № 84. February 2021
Creating National Digital Sovereignty in the Context of Spatial Development Differentiation
Lidiya S. Leontieva, Marianna V. Kudina, Aleksandr S. Voronov, Stepan S. Sergeev
Lidiya S. Leontieva — DSc (Economics), Professor, Professor of Department of Regional and Municipal Administration, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail: leontieva@spa.msu.ru
Marianna V. Kudina — DSc (Economics), Professor, Head of Department of Economics of Innovative Development, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail: kudina@spa.msu.ru
Aleksandr S. Voronov — PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Economics of Innovative Development, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail: voronov@spa.msu.ru ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0058-9217
Stepan S. Sergeev — Research Intern, Department of Economics of Innovative Development, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail: sergeevss@spa.msu.ru
Digitalization of public and municipal administration opens new technological opportunities for solving problems of spatial development and at the same time is associated with fundamentally new challenges, including the need to form digital sovereignty at all administration levels. The processes of digitalization at the regional and local levels and the formation of national digital sovereignty mutually influence each other. The purpose of the present study is to determine such mutual influence in the conditions of spatial development differentiation. To achieve this goal, scientific methods were used, including comparative analysis, a multi-axis assessment map, content analysis of regulatory legal acts, materials of Russian and foreign researchers, expert organizations. In the article the analysis of the system of electronic public services current state in Russia as one of the key for forming and maintaining digital sovereignty is carried out; regional differences in approaches to the provision of state and municipal services in digital form are identified; the transfer of inequality in Russian regions to the digital environment is justified; the lack of security of digitalization processes at the municipal level is revealed, including the uneven regulatory support for digital development of territories; the key barriers that generate digital inequality in regions and municipalities are identified and classified. Thus, the thesis is confirmed that the existing differentiation of spatial and digital development has a negative and constraining effect on the processes of forming national digital sovereignty, which do not consider the regional and local specifics of digital transformation. The results of the research can be used in the future to create a relevant conceptual model of national digital sovereignty in the context of transformation and digitalization of the socio-political and economic spheres of life of modern states.
Keywords
Digital sovereignty, spatial development, socio-economic development, digital basket, netocracy, cyberdoytocracy, public services, USIA (Unified System of Identification and Authentication), UPPS (Unified Portal of Public Services), SIEI (System of Interdepartmental Electronic Interaction).
DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2021-84-277-299
No material published in this journal may be reproduced in print or in electronic form without a link to "E-journal. Public Administrarion".
|