Archive
2020 78 79 80 81 82  
2019 72 73 74 75 76 77
2018 66 67 68 69 70 71
2017 60 61 62 63 64 65
2016 54 55 56 57 58 59
2015 48 49 50 51 52 53
2014 42 43 44 45 46 47
2013 36 37 38 39 40 41
2012 30 31 32 33 34 35
2011 26 27 28 29    
News
Submit your article
Newsletter


Issue № 78. February 2020

Participatory Budgeting: Experience of the People

Kirill I. Galynis, Hongliang Miao

Kirill I. Galynis — PhdHulunbuir university, Hailar District, Hulunbuir, People's Republic of China.
E-mail: rapid-leopard@yandex.ru
 

Hongliang Miao — Phd, Hulunbuir university, Hailar District, Hulunbuir, People's Republic of China.
E-mail: ideafree2004@hotmail.com

The subject of the study is the models of population involvement in the budget process, practiced in the People's Republic of China. The purpose of this study is to identify the features of the models and to consider the prospects for implementing this experience in Russian practice. The method used in the research is the theoretical base analysis. Data sources are scientific articles from the RSCI database, Google Scholar, the national knowledge base of China (CNKI), official legal acts of the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation. The analysis of the scientific literature conducted earlier in the field of initiative budgeting has shown that the theoretical basis of this mechanism is still being developed, discussed and focused primarily on domestic practice. Foreign experience is usually reflected in fragments and without further consideration of the prospects for innovations in Russia. In this regard, the authors consider the models of population involvement in the budget process, practiced in Wuxi, Chengdu, Yanjing, Meilan. Considerable attention is also paid to the related practice deliberative democracy emerged in Wenling. The main result is that the considered models have different ways of involving the population in the budget process, but rural and city committees have significant role in most of them. Analogues of ones are Territorial Public Self-Government (TPSG) and gatherings of citizens in Russia. Using TPSG, following the example of the PRC, can lead to ignoring the interests of some residents of municipalities. In our opinion, it is perspective to use the experience of Yanjin and Wenling to change the practices of participatory budgeting, Meilan to implement certain innovations in the program of support for local initiatives.

Keywords

Participatory budgeting, public participation, initiative budgeting, local initiatives, credit resources.

DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10036

Comments:
No material published in this journal may be reproduced in print or in electronic form without a link to "E-journal. Public Administrarion".
119991, Room A-710, Shuvalovskiy building, Lomonosov Moscow State University
(27/4, Lomonosovskiy Avenue); phone: +7 (495) 930-85-71
Copyright © 2015 SPA MSU


Яндекс.Метрика